In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) leadership is shaping geopolitical influence, a new report from interface, a European think tank specialising in information technology and public policy, provides a critical tool to understand the people behind the technology. “Technical Tiers: A New Classification Framework for Global AI Workforce Analysis” introduces a groundbreaking three-tier system that distinguishes not just how many people work in AI, but how deeply they engage with its most complex technologies.
Rather than lumping all AI-related professionals into a single bucket, the study categorises them into:
- Category 0: Non-technical roles or those with an interest in AI but no direct engagement.
- Category 1: Practitioners in technical roles using standard data science and basic machine learning.
- Category 2: Highly specialized experts developing or applying deep learning methods like neural networks, transformers, and generative AI.
The researchers analysed over 1.6 million profiles across 31 countries, uncovering telling patterns about who is driving advanced AI development, and where they are choosing to do it.
Specialisation signals strength
One of the clearest findings of the report reveals that with 27% of South Korea’s AI workforce in deep-tech roles and 20% in Japan, Asian nations are surging ahead in Category 2 talent. Meanwhile, Poland and Germany stand out in Europe, as hubs for homegrown talent and magnets for international experts.
These trends are no accident.
Proactive strategies to boost AI capabilities that align with national goals with investment in AI education, research infrastructure, and immigration reform have been implemented in countries such as South Korea and Poland. While Germany, known for its elite research institutions, is a key player in underscoring the importance of ecosystems that cultivate talent and innovation simultaneously.
Migration is more than movement
The report’s insights on talent mobility highlights that countries with points-based immigration systems attract 1.5 times more high-skilled AI professionals than those with demand-led models. The implication is clear: clear, flexible pathways into AI ecosystems matter deeply to global talent.
As the U.S. and UK make it harder for skilled workers to move there, this puts Europe in a strong position as countries such as Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands are actively lowering the barriers by digitizing visa processes, offering tax breaks for expats, and embracing English-friendly policies.
The result? Countries that actively welcome AI foreign and domestic talent are building not just larger workforces, but more capable and specialized ones.
Europe’s gender advantage
Global AI remains male-dominated; however, the report finds that Europe leads the way in female representation in Category 2 roles. Finland tops the list with 39%, followed by Czechia (31%) and Italy (28%, and these numbers suggest that policies promoting gender equality, flexible work, and parental leave aren’t just good for inclusion, they are strategic assets.
Yet, the report also notes a ‘leaky pipeline’. Female representation drops significantly at senior levels across all countries, including those with otherwise high participation rates. Finland again leads with 41% of senior executive AI roles held by women, but most nations still fall well below 20%. The takeaway? Gender-inclusive policies must not stop at hiring, they must extend to career progression.
Data-driven strategy for a talent-hungry future
Europe has bold plans for AI, €200 billion in investment and AI Factories across 17 Member States. But as this report makes clear, infrastructure alone is not enough. Talent composition, especially in Category 2, will define success.
This means that investing in education, attracting diverse talent, and removing systemic barriers, especially for women and migrants, could be the difference between playing catch-up and setting the pace in global AI.
Moreover, the report’s innovative use of Large Language Model-based (LLM-based) classification (using LLaMA 3.1) to analyse workforce profiles marks a leap forward in how we understand technical specialization. This method not only boosts analytical accuracy but provides a replicable model for future workforce assessments.
If AI is the engine of future economies, then specialised talent is the fuel. And while Europe may have more in the tank than many think, maintaining that lead will require thoughtful, inclusive, and agile policies. The race is for better aligned, better supported, and more equitably distributed talent, not simply ‘more’ talent. This report is both a roadmap and a wake-up call.
Partners
